← Pediatric research · References

Pediatric model comparison and evidence

Abdalla 2020 and Zeng 2009 predict different exposures in different pediatric populations. The comparison evaluates typical IV concentration profiles across body weight and renal function.

Research only. Equal numerical renal inputs are not necessarily equal physiologic renal function: the studies used different creatinine-based estimators. Unit conversion does not reconcile those estimators. No neonatal, dialysis, or dosing recommendation follows from this table.

Model predictions

Illustrative 10 mg/kg every 8 hours, infused over 1 hour. Renal inputs are indexed mL/min/1.73 m². Clearance is L/h; peak and trough are theoretical steady-state mg/L. These are model predictions, not patient observations. Random effects are excluded.

Weight kgRenal inputAbdalla CLZeng CLAbdalla peak / troughZeng peak / trough
10902.5601.9659.700 / 1.84521.054 / 0.540
101203.0942.2768.957 / 1.20620.130 / 0.289
101603.7382.6358.350 / 0.74019.207 / 0.141
19.6904.2413.25510.506 / 2.58522.166 / 1.003
19.61205.1253.7699.609 / 1.76521.192 / 0.588
19.61606.1934.3658.883 / 1.14620.264 / 0.319
40907.2415.55811.545 / 3.57123.475 / 1.761
401208.7506.43610.449 / 2.53122.386 / 1.115
4016010.5747.4539.563 / 1.72421.397 / 0.663

Zeng: CL = 3.55 × (weight/19.6)0.75 × (CLCR/3.7)0.51; V = 7.36 × (weight/19.6). Convert the indexed renal input to CLCR in L/h/m² by multiplying by 60/1000/1.73. All rows lie within both studies’ marginal weight and renal ranges; this does not establish joint covariate support.

Evidence base and study limitations

Parameter extraction and cohort overlap · Calculation methods